Custom networks and chain infrastructure
Plan a standalone network or a rollup-based architecture around your execution, settlement and governance requirements. Node operation, RPC access, validators or sequencers and upgrades are part of the scope.
Your idea. A clear path to launch.
Bring your blockchain idea to a practical build plan. CodeUpp scopes and develops custom blockchain networks, L1 and L2 infrastructure, smart contracts and DApps, with explorers, testnet faucets and the operational tools needed to support a real launch.
What we can build
Plan a standalone network or a rollup-based architecture around your execution, settlement and governance requirements. Node operation, RPC access, validators or sequencers and upgrades are part of the scope.
Build a branded explorer experience for blocks, transactions, addresses and tokens, with contract verification where supported. Add a testnet faucet, network configuration guides and developer onboarding.
Connect contracts to usable interfaces for swaps, staking, token launches, marketplaces, prediction markets or other agreed workflows. Supporting APIs, indexers and administrator tools are specified alongside the frontend.
We can assess an Ethereum-compatible or BNB Smart Chain-style network, a Solana-based application or an independently operated network based on an appropriate open-source stack. These are different engineering projects. EVM compatibility does not make a network equivalent to Ethereum, and a Solana application is not simply a Solidity contract deployed elsewhere. We define the execution environment, consensus or validation model, infrastructure and licensing before committing to a chain build.
For an L1, the scope includes the network’s validation model, genesis configuration, node software, infrastructure and governance. For an L2 or app-specific rollup, we assess settlement, data availability, sequencing, upgrade authority and bridge dependencies. Arbitrum’s chain framework is one documented route for configurable chains; the appropriate deployment model and current requirements must be checked for your project. We can also evaluate other ecosystems when their tooling, licences and infrastructure fit the brief. A testnet milestone precedes decisions about production readiness.
We can develop an explorer with familiar functions such as block and transaction lookup, address histories, token pages, contract interaction and source verification where the stack supports them. A solution may use an appropriately licensed platform such as Blockscout or a custom implementation. Etherscan is a separate product and brand; an independent explorer does not automatically receive its services or verification integrations. Indexing, RPC capacity, archive requirements and ongoing operations are included in the technical assessment.
A faucet distributes test assets so developers can try transactions without using production funds. We can build request limits, abuse controls, balance monitoring and an administrative interface, together with network setup instructions and sample DApps. Public RPC endpoints, explorer links and supported wallet settings should agree with the actual chain configuration. Faucet assets are test assets; the page must not suggest that they have guaranteed monetary value.
We can scope swap interfaces, pool creation, liquidity provision, trading history and analytics with custom or integrated contracts. An automated market maker and an order-book exchange have different matching and accounting requirements. We define liquidity arrangements, slippage controls, token approval behaviour and operator responsibilities before development. Reusing an available protocol requires checking the relevant version and licence; a familiar interface alone does not reproduce the protocol or bring market liquidity.
Prediction-market projects need precise event definitions, resolution sources, disputes and settlement rules. Lottery-style DApps need participation rules, independently verifiable randomness where appropriate, prize accounting and cancellation behaviour. Token-launch platforms need creation rules, pricing or bonding-curve logic, fees, liquidity transitions and controls against abusive listings. We can translate these ideas into original product specifications and software. The permitted audiences, licences and operating restrictions must be established for the intended markets before a public money-involving launch.
Our smart contract work can cover tokens, vesting, staking, escrow, governance, marketplaces and protocol-specific logic. We can analyse existing contracts through an agreed source review, automated checks and targeted tests, then document findings and verify fixes. The review identifies the exact code version and limitations. No review proves that all vulnerabilities have been removed, and internal development testing should not be presented as an independent audit. High-value deployments need a separately agreed assurance and release process.
Discovery produces the feature scope, trust assumptions and infrastructure plan. The prototype or testnet demonstrates representative transactions before the team expands the feature set. Release work includes configuration, permissions, deployment records, monitoring and a runbook for failures and upgrades. We separate build cost from node hosting, RPC providers, indexing, external audits and ongoing operations. Bring a reference product or a written idea: we will identify what can be built, what depends on third parties and what should be validated first.
Your project may need more than one service. Explore the connected capabilities below to define the complete scope.
These references explain the underlying platforms. They do not imply a partnership or endorsement of CodeUpp.
Built for international collaboration
We welcome project discussions from the markets below. We agree language, time-zone overlap, currency, provider availability and applicable local requirements during discovery. These are service markets, not a list of local offices or a promise that every product can operate in every country.
United Arab Emirates · Saudi Arabia · Qatar · Kuwait · Bahrain · Oman
United Kingdom · Germany · Netherlands · Denmark · Sweden · Ireland · Portugal · Spain · France
United States · Canada · Australia · Egypt · South Africa
India · Pakistan · Bangladesh · Singapore · Malaysia · Turkey · China
Before we begin
We can scope an independently branded network or application using suitable technology and permitted source code. A clone does not inherit the original network’s validators, economic security, liquidity, users or brand. Ethereum-compatible L1s, Solana-based networks and Arbitrum-based rollups require different architecture and operating plans.
Yes. They can be included as separate deliverables with supported lookup, verification and test-asset distribution features. The proposal defines indexing, hosting, API limits and maintenance so the chain launch is not confused with a fully operated ecosystem.
Yes. An application on an existing network may suit the project better than a new chain. We compare the required control, supported tooling, operating responsibilities and integration needs before recommending the architecture.
We can assess other L1 and L2 ecosystems against the project requirements. Support is confirmed after reviewing the execution model, available tooling, licence terms and deployment requirements; we do not assume all networks are interchangeable.
No. A review provides findings about a defined code version and scope. It reduces uncertainty but cannot guarantee the absence of vulnerabilities, economic attacks or operational mistakes. Remediation, retesting and independent review can be planned as separate stages.
The estimate depends on the agreed features, content readiness, integrations, data migration and testing. We define milestones and acceptance criteria after reviewing your brief, and separate development from hosting, licences and ongoing support.
Yes. We can discuss remote delivery for the markets listed on this page. The brief confirms languages, working-hour overlap, currencies, provider availability and any local requirements. The list describes intended service markets, not a claim of offices in every country.
The agreed handover can include custom source code, setup instructions, administrator guidance and deployment documentation after completion and payment. Third-party software remains subject to its own licence. Maintenance and future changes are scoped separately.
Let’s define the next step
Share the goal, the features you need and any existing system. We’ll discuss the scope and the questions to resolve before development.